Search this site



powered by
FreeFind


This website is undergoing a redesign in 2015 that will last for several months.
Some links may not work and some pages may display badly. Apologies for any inconvenience.










All Rights Reserved
Text: Copyright GWBAA

Copyright of pictures acknowledged where known



Having problems viewing this page? It performs best in Mozilla Firefox.






Chapter Three: God the Creator?

Section 6: Summary

Chapter One showed us that if there is a God, we cannot be certain about his nature. Chapter Two confirmed that the Jewish / Christian / Muslim versions of God are impossible and other versions appear irrelevant. This chapter looks at the question: do we need God to explain the existence of the universe or our presence on this Earth?

1. Ignoring the physical evidence, we start with the philosophical question, does the universe prove the existence of God? We conclude no; it is more likely that the universe exists without God than with him.
Section 1

2. Probability is not proof, however, so we examine the cosmological evidence. Although the universe appears to have been created, it is possible that the universe exists alone.
Section 2

3. Creationism claims that the Bible proves that God created the universe, but its methods are unreliable (it spurns science and relies on rationalisation not reason) and its basic text is muddled and contradictory.
Section 3

4. Intelligent design (ID) is based on the idea that some organisms are too complex to have evolved without a supranatural designer, but every example it puts forward proves evolution rather than ID.
Section 4

5. Evolution, supported by evidence from geology and biology, offers the most credible explanation for the origins of life on Earth. Unexplained phenomena in evolution are not proof that evolution is false, only that further research is needed.
Section 5

Points 1, 2 and 5 (philosophy, cosmology and evolution) confirm that the idea of God is



Explaining the Universe

Jews, Christians and Muslims insist that God created the universe. In both philosophical and practical terms, however, that theory turns out to be unsustainable.

3.1: God the Created?
Where did God come from?

3.2: The balanced universe
Improbable is not impossible

3.3: Creationism
Holes in Noah's Ark

3.4: Intelligent design
False assumptions and faulty reasoning

3.5: Evolution
Reproduction, mutation and environment

3.6: Summary



Finished this chapter? Move on to

Chapter 4
Why people believe


If God does not exist, why do so many people believe in him?

There are many reasons, from the strength of community to fear of death.



Not sure what you're looking for?

If there's a word that you don't recognize, it might be defined here.

If there's a topic you're looking for, check the Search boxes at the top and bottom of this page.

If there's something you want to ask, send an e-mail. We can't guarantee an answer, but we'll do our best.
unnecessary - he is not needed to explain the existence of either the universe or life on this planet. Points 3 and 4 (creationism and intelligent design) insist that God exist, but their arguments are unsustainable.

explanation starting point research base use of science
creationism God created the universe the Bible sporadic
intelligent design some lifeforms
appear complex
specific lifeforms sporadic
evolution the origins of all life and lifeforms all geology, fossils, biology, DNA at all times

explanation strengths weaknesses credible?
creationism ??????

dependent on
inadequate and contradictory knowledge base;
uses rationalisation not reasoning;
key points unexplained
only to those who do not understand science
intelligent design ??????

depends on preconceived notions of complexity; continually revising knowledge base
only to those who place boundaries around science
evolution explains all lifeforms; is capable of prediction and revision several key areas remain to be explained yes

Creationism is a mountain of rationalisation and fudged science teetering precariously on the base of a few hundred words of contradictory and muddled text written over two thousand years ago. Intelligent design is the illogical claim that lack of knowledge is proof of God. Both explanations for the origins of life are inherently flawed. In contrast, evolution is an extensive body of evidence grounded in science capable of independent proof and modification as new evidence appears.

As for God? Philosophy suggests universe-no-God is more likely than universe-God. The Bible itself demonstrates, through its many contradictions, uncertainties and gaps in information both that it cannot be the basis of serious science and that the Jewish-Christian deity does not exist. At first glance, the evidence for ID appears more solid, but on examination all such evidence fades away and with it vanishes the hypothetical designer. And finally science, through cosmology and evolution, confirms that God is redundant.

We have come to the end of our search. We have looked everywhere for the deity and found only illusion and deception. We can safely conclude that God does not exist - nor does Satan or heaven or hell or any other aspect of the supernatural. It is time to move on and ask ourselves: despite the evidence, why do so many people still believe in him? And what would life be like in a world without God?



Next
Chapter Four: Why people believe







Custom Search

Do you have a question / comment about this page?
Email us, pasting the URL into your letter with the comment
This account is protected by Spamarrest.
You will receive a one-off request to verify your email before it is delivered.


If God existed, he would...

admire the beauty of a universe that he did not create

recognize that eternity is meaningless

deny both heaven and hell

disown all men and women who speak in his name

denounce the harm caused by religious "morality"

help the human race to thrive without him

If God existed, he would be an atheist.



What is the difference between science and faith?

science is certain of nothing and requires proof of everything

faith is certain of everything and requires proof of nothing

Which do you trust?


"I know there is no God"
or
"I believe there is no God"
???


Check the answer





Supporting advertisers helps to provide an income for this site. Clicking on advertiser links on this site may allow these companies to gather and use information, via technology installed on the computer(s) you use, about you and your visit to this and other websites to provide you with advertisements about goods and services presumed to be of interest to you.